Biography of Democritus, Greek Philosopher

Democritus of Abdera (ca. 460–361) was a pre-socratic Greek philosopher who traveled widely as a youth and developed a philosophy and some rather forward-looking ideas about how the universe worked. He was a bitter rival of both Plato and Aristotle.   Key Takeaways: Democritus Known For: Greek philosopher of Atomism, the Laughing Philosopher  Born: 460 BCE, Abdera, ThraceParents: Hegesistratus (or Damasippus or Athenocritus)Died: 361, AthensEducation: Self-educatedPublished Works: Little World-Order, at least 70 other works which are not extantNotable Quote: Life in a foreign land teaches self-sufficiency, for bread and a mattress of straw are the sweetest cures for hunger and fatigue. Early Life   Democritus was born about 460 BCE at Abdera in Thrace, the son of a wealthy, well-connected man named Hegesistratus (or Damasippus or Athenocritus—sources vary.) His father had large enough parcels of land that he was said to be able to house the Persian king Xerxes formidable army in 480 when he was on his way to conquer Greece.   When his father died, Democritus took his inheritance and spent it traveling to distant lands, slaking his nearly endless thirst for knowledge. He traveled over much of Asia, studied geometry in Egypt, went to the Red Sea and Persia regions to learn from the Chaldeans, and may have visited Ethiopia.  Ã‚   After returning home, he traveled widely in Greece, meeting many of the Greek philosophers and becoming friends with other pre-socratic thinkers such as Leucippus (died 370 BCE), Hippocrates (460–377 BCE), and Anaxagoras (510–428 BCE). Although none of his dozens of essays on everything from mathematics to ethics to music to natural science have survived to the present day, pieces and second-hand reports of his work are convincing evidence. Engraving from a bust in the Museum at the Vatican of the Greek philosopher Democritus.   Time Life Pictures / Getty Images The Epicurean   Democritus was known as the Laughing Philosopher, in part because he enjoyed life and followed an epicurean lifestyle. He was a cheerful teacher and writer of many things—he wrote in a strong Ionic dialect and style that the orator Cicero (106–43 BCE) admired. His writing was often favorably compared to Plato (428–347 BCE), which did not please Plato. In his underlying ethical nature, he believed that a life worth living was a life enjoyed and that many people crave a long life but dont enjoy it because all the pleasure is overshadowed by a fear of death. Atomism   Along with the philosopher Leucippus, Democritus is credited with founding the ancient theory of atomism. These philosophers were trying to form a way to explain how changes in the world are generated—where does life arise and how?   Democritus and Leucippus maintained that the entire universe is made up of atoms and voids. Atoms, they said, are elementary particles that are indestructible, homogeneous in quality, and move around in the spaces between them. Atoms are infinitely variable in their shape and size, and everything that exists is made up of clusters of atoms. All creation or genesis results from the coming together of atoms, their colliding and clustering, and all decay results from the clusters eventually breaking apart. To Democritus and Leucippus, everything from the sun and the moon to the soul are made up of atoms. Visible objects are clusters of atoms in different shapes, arrangements, and positions. The clusters act on each other, said Democritus, by pressure or impact from a series of external forces, such as a magnet on iron, or light on the eye.   Democritus and Heraclitus. Oil on canvas by Giuseppe Maria Crespi, called Lo Spagnuolo (1665-1747). Toulouse, musee des Augustins. adoc-photos / Getty Images Perception   Democritus was supremely interested in how perception occurs, in such a world with atoms in it, and he concluded that visible images are created by the peeling off of layers from objects. The human eye is an organ that can perceive such layers, and communicate information to the individual.  To explore his notions of perceptions, Democritus is said to have dissected animals and was accused (apparently falsely) of doing the same to humans. He also felt that different taste sensations were the product of differently shaped atoms: some atoms tear the tongue creating a bitter taste, while others are smooth and create sweetness.   However, the knowledge gained from perception is imperfect, he believed, and to gain true knowledge, one must use the intellect to avoid false impressions from the outer world and discover a causality and meaning. The processes of thought, said Democritus and Leucippus, is also a result of those atomistic impacts. Death and Legacy Democritus is said to have lived a very long life—some sources say he was 109 when he died in Athens. He died in poverty and blindness but was highly esteemed. The historian Diogenes Laertius (180–240 CE) wrote a biography of Democritus, although only fragments survive today. Diogenes listed 70 works by Democritus, none of which made it to the present, but there are multitudes of revealing excerpts, and one fragment relating to atomism called the Little World Order, a companion to Leucippus World Order. Sources and Further Reading Berryman, Sylvia. Democritus. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, Edward N. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016.  Chitwood, Ava. Death by Philosophy: The Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2004.  Luthy, Christoph. The Fourfold Democritus on the Stage of Early Modern Science. Isis 91.3 (2000): 443–79.Rudolph, Kelli. Democritus Ophthalmology. The Classical Quarterly 62.2 (2012): 496–501.Smith, William, and G.E. Marindon, eds. Democritus. A Classical Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography, Mythology, and Geography. London: John Murray, 1904.Stewart, Zeph. Democritus and the Cynics. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63 (1958): 179–91.Warren, J. I. Democritus, the Epicureans, Death, and Dying. The Classical Quarterly 52.1 (2002): 193–206.

Women in the Mexican Revolution Thesis Examples

Throughout time, women all over the globe have had a major role in history.   Nevertheless, they are not been well acknowledged and their tales are not told to other people as much as men. Mexican women fought hard for an improved and better future for all the generation to come. They struggled courageously and unselfishly and made their marks in today’s globe. In the world we are living majority of the women have been treated in a manner that they are good looking and thus other women attempts to emulate them. However, this has not always been the case with the common woman. On the other hand, the women who are used in most of these commercial gives a negative image to the other women that being slim or dressing in a certain manner is good and to a woman. Because of this, women who are overweight and normal experiences a feeling that they should take care of themselves and be similar to the images they see on the commercials. Henceforth, this pressurized the common woman to maintain their body and shape and take care of their eating habits. As a result, they experience certain problems such as eating disorder, lack of self-esteem while other opts for beauty therapy in order to look good. Main literature Mexican woman has crossed the boundaries of gender rolls and the picture of pre-revolutionary tells it all. The woman had lived her life continually in a male shadow and acted as a male. All these women were inspired by their nuptials, family life, the Catholic minster, and survived mutely behind their leading male counterpart. In 1885 Mexican civil codes were enacted by the administration. It significantly limited all right of a woman at her own home and place of work. According to Barson sustains an almost implausible inequality between the circumstances of husband and wife, limits in an overstated and arbitrary method those rights due the woman, and erases and nullifies her personality (Barson 351). Women started finding a place where she could fit when Mexican Revolution of 1911-1920 began to eliminate favoritism that Diaz included in his government. During this time, women were given opportunity to control their own destiny and live. Mexican women were also implicated in political matters. They were well-known political campaigners, philosophers, writers, role models, and were known to be courageous in their quest of fulfilling their ambitions. Majority of these females set example to the modern woman. Example of the most amazing women was Hermila Galindo and Dolores Jimenez. Another woman who lived in the crossed the boundaries of gender rolls in mexico is Dolores Jimenez y Muro. She was born in June 1848 and managed to become a qualified school teacher. She later died in 1848 after accomplishing her mission. Throughout the revolution, she was a political radical, a qualified poet, a provider to left-wing periodicals, and an ardent follower of Emiliano Zapata (Ambler 57). She was also a great and admired political figure. She was among the groups that made decisions to form a revolution so as to bring Madero to authority. She could compile ideas from other revolutionist and come up with final decision. The ideas were later presented to the government and contained lots of development. These comprised of; need for improved working surroundings, improved wages, maximum working hours, enlightening reform, and lots of other reforms. For instance; it declared that in any overseas corporation operating in Mexico, should employ half of their workers from Mexico, and they should be paid the same salaries and toil the same hours as overseas employees. The manuscript was also implemented to illustrate Jimenez’s influence and significance in the Revolution since in it she had incorporated lot of her own thoughts for reforms. Her experiences as an instructor were clear in the document to spread out the Mexican educational scheme. The reform would permit schools to be financed and directed locally, so that every institution would obtain individual consideration. She as well added that; the charges of metropolis real estate should be reassessed so as to reduce the cost of rental fee that the lower classes had to pay (Ambler 59). A statistic in 1911 indicated that; women form only 8.9% of the labor force in Mexico; this led to omission from any economical developments. The statistic was not for real and it’s only because lots of Mexican women could not confess to working in front of men. Jimenez drew attention to the fact that the salary augments should be for both sexes. Throughout her own determination to modify the course of Mexicos financial system and political, Jimenez y became important to the society for her effort. Bearing in mind how a woman was looked by the society at this time, it was astonishing that she turned out as a strong political figure and most people admired her. Majority of Mexican men and women could not have enough strength to take such steps.   Jimenez went from relative obscurity as an educator to a political philosopher in the ranks with huge revolutionary, Zapata (Barson 123). If she did not fight for the Plan may changes could not have taken place. She also managed to acquire enough respect as a woman and her thoughts were respected. There is also another huge woman political figure and was known as Hermila Galindo. She was born in Lerdo mexico in the year 1897. All thorough her political profession, she inscribed lots of political articles, was a municipal supporter of Carranza in several Mexican states. She was also a writer and editor of magazines e.g. feminist magazine from 1916-1918. Because of her cleverness, outstanding speaking abilities, she rose rapidly. Carranza recognized her after the collapse of General Victoriano Huerta when she was chosen to give a salutation speech. After the speech, Carranza was right away overwhelmed by her expressiveness and cleverness and he requested her to unite with his administration. This might have been a bright trick he applied so as women could support him.   Nonetheless, Galindo was a great supporter and contributor to his government. She could write numerous editorials and spoke to lots of womens organizations, contributing and supporting Carranzas law and to pers uade women to become part of revolutionary groups. Galindo also played a major role as a woman. She was able to establish her own periodical which was known as Moderna, where she supported ideas from women and Carranzas administration. Her speeches and writing openly assaults the Catholic, which was outstanding since religion was by no means revealed in any feminist movements. It was an essential step she took since, she understood that religious obsession played a major position in the suppression of women, and that was the main reason why she was not against sex education in institutions. Galindo claimed for same rights as for both women and men, and she also confronted constitutional conference claiming for woman suffrage. Even though she did not succeed, she declared running for a position in the hall of Deputies. She did not manage but her strategies were later utilized by feminists in 1920s and 40s. Galindo was a respected political figure since she had the power and strength to face a powerful opposition and declared her opinion on lots of disliked matters that may have been unnoticed. She was very important to the Revolution since she attended to feminist troubles and brought them to the spot light. Even though Galindo was not at all times victorious, she set a path for today feminists. A Mexican woman was not only a significant role models and political figures, but they were also victorious on the battlefields. All these women who crossed the boundaries of gender rolls were known as soldier-women. They are also known as battlefield champions of Mexican Revolution. Unluckily, their names or what they contributed to Mexican government, have been omitted or forgotten form all journal, and historical books. Most people are not aware of the soldier-women and are not even sure if they existed. Conclusion In conclusion, if these courageous Mexican women did not exist, the revolution would have turned to be a diverse fight and would be impossible for women to show her aptitudes or gotten the acknowledgment. During this time, women fought hard for an improved and better future for all the generation to come. They struggled courageously and unselfishly and made their marks in today’s globe. They therefore ought to be honored but instead they have already been forgotten. These women who have crossed the boundaries of gender rolls taking key positions have already set an example of how a woman should struggle. Sorrowfully, although Mexican women pervaded every place in the civilization of the revolution, they were not well recognized. Their stories have already been forgotten and re-written by people who use their work and ideas. It is clear that Mexican womens involvements were the same as those of men. Work cited Ambler, T.   Persuasion, Pride and Prejudice: How Ads Work, International Journal of Advertising, Volume 19, No 3. 2001 pg 40-50 Barson, Kalman. Investigative accounting: techniques and procedures for determining the reality behind the financial statements. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishing, 2010. Print.

A Speech On The Speech - 1833 Words

The chairperson assumed the dais and stepped to the fore. She paused, mobile in raised hand. The audience, chattering with speculation, failed to notice. She tapped the screen, a deep gong reverberated throughout the great hall. Although it required a couple of repeats, the chattering died away. A few self-appointed sergeants-at-arms aided the process. One-by-one they persuaded a few less compliant individuals to focus on the proceedings. The guest speaker relaxed unconcerned on the rostrum, smiling but otherwise impassive, waiting. The chairperson began the introduction. Ladies and Gentlemen, you have no doubt heard hints of the momentous news we are here to disclose today. Yes, it is true. I feel confident in stating what you are about†¦show more content†¦The guest speaker s stage presence demanded their attention. The esteemed Dr. Shepherd made a minor show of laying his mobile on the lectern so the screen might be visible. He adjusted the device, as though arranging notes. He took a sip of water, and squared his shoulders. He then reached across, grasping the lectern on the side nearest the audience. A big man, he draped his whole body across the tiny desk. He bowed his head a moment. Then, with slow deliberation, he raised his eyes to meet full-on the audience s gaze. Friends, he began with a soft rumble in his voice. I stand before you today, a man as human as any of you, yet not of your world. A dramatic pause as his words register. Murmurs of disbelief trickled through the audience, ceasing as he began to speak again. I wish to thank you for your hospitality. I have traveled light-years to tell you that you are not alone in the Universe. We are not alone. That by itself would be momentous news, but there is more. Not only is there another people in the Universe. Not only my own people, but there are other peoples beyond my own. The audience erupted in protest, unbelieving. At that he paused, turned to the chairperson, and gave a small hand signal. She stood and went to the curtain beside the stage as he continued speaking. He raised his voice over the rising din. Please allow me to introduce my dear friends, two lovely ladies from Nekomata. With that Stapleya and Wisceya stepped from

Melodious poems Essay Example For Students

Melodious poems Essay UA fanthorpe have moved her pen and has changed words into melodious poems. She has written poems based on Christmas, paintings and many other themes. The two poems that stands out the most for me are not my best side and Woman Ironing because in both these poem Fanthorpe challenges the painters point of view and gives a different perspective on the events depicted. She always tried to bring out the women behind the canvas by giving her voice. Not my best side and woman ironing share a similar idea where in both the paintings the characters tells the story. UA fanthorpe has changed the artists vision of the painting and has transformed it into the characters story. In the painting the woman says The artist didnt give me a chance to pose properly. Fanthorpe has brought the woman alive by criticizing the way the artist has depicted her. The criticism of the artist continues as she says Poor chap he has obsession with triangles. UA fanthorpe has analyzed this piece of art and is giving comments on it. The main mission of UA fanthorpe was to give the voice to the women in this piece of art and this links with other poems she have written such as woman ironing. In woman ironing it has a similar idea of giving the voice to a women In the late 19th century and early 20th century woman did not have the right to speak out or to express their opinion and was held back. It was considered that their main aim was housekeeping but this convention was challenged by the suffragists and the poems by UA fanthorpe is a tribute to them who spoke out the right time and who broke the convention of women does not have a voice. Woman ironing is inspired by paintings by Edgar Degas of woman ironing from the 1880s. Both the poems are depicted on paintings and they give different perspective. Woman ironing is a peculiar piece of poem because UA fanthorpe used her poems to show her tribute to women and one of the great example is Mother scrubbing the floor but in this poem it is different. In woman ironing UA Fanthorpe neglected the feminism of women and gave traits of masculinity in it. In the poem it says Show us that muscle power. This is not conventionally linked with women. In this poem the fact that she is a women is also neglected as it says in the poem I mightve been an engine, not a person. Another example which shows the negligence of feminism is And can anyone tell that under my arms I m sweating This poem does not represent UA Fanthorpes intention of upholding women. In both of the poems what UA FAnthorpe wanted to depict was the work of art which they both share and wanted to give a voice to both the characters of the painting. Edgar Degas is famous for Ballerina paintings and this painting of women ironing is not the type of painting he usually does. In woman ironing the background seems dull and boring and in one picture the woman ironing is not shown but just the shadow of her. In the picture where it shows her shadow it shows that women at the time were behind a wall and were not given freedom and this links in with the theme of giving the women a voice. UA fanthorpe brings this imagery of womens shadow and links it in the poem. it says You are not here to tell me what to do . This shows the authority and superiority. She is considered as a slave and an e. g for this is I am used to rudeness. .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f , .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .postImageUrl , .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f , .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:hover , .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:visited , .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:active { border:0!important; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:active , .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uff4d3722406994b998fbdd8bf69c278f:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Compare the ways which poets explore different themes EssayThis clearly suggests that she is not even given the equal respects as for other characters. She is considered as slave and with the dull and boring background the imagery is portrayed to the audience. In both of these poems UA fanthorpe was portraying a message which that she wants to give the women the voice which thy didnt have i the late 19th century. She wants to give the voice and wants them to be considered equal and she has done with the help paintings. She has given a voice to the characters which was just some clutter of paint.